[Bundy-hackers] Fwd: Bundy idea
David Carlier dcarlier at afilias.infoFri Sep 12 07:50:07 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Bundy-hackers] Fwd: Bundy idea
- Next message: [Bundy-hackers] Fwd: Bundy idea
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi and thanks for your inputs. Actually the geolocalization support is set per --with-geoloc-<name of the API>=yes/no/path of headers... but if a module is wished, I could change it indeed. Kind regards. On 12 September 2014 06:41, Carsten Strotmann <carsten at strotmann.de> wrote: > Hello David, > > David Carlier wrote: > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: *David Carlier* <dcarlier at afilias.info <mailto: > dcarlier at afilias.info>> > > Date: 10 September 2014 19:35 > > Subject: Bundy idea > > To: dhcp-hackers at lists.isc.org <mailto:dhcp-hackers at lists.isc.org> > > > > > > HI all, > > Quite a long time I did not come back on Kea/Bundy (got caught recently > > with HardenedBSD...) but last year I brought PostgreSQL support idea for > > Kea, this year I had another one in mind ... for Bundy ! > > > > I work a lot (and made one myself) with Geolocalisation APIS and was > > wondering if in acl level it is worthy to bring this new logic (I know > > it existed some patches for Bind9 with GeoIP support) ? > > A geolocation function is interesting. I know at least two customers > that in the past had interest in an geolocation function in Bundy (when > it still was BIND 10). > > BIND 9 now has official geolocation support in the 9.10 release. > > > I made already > > few work about it but before going further I wanted your opinion. But > > instead of one unique instance I thought more to bring a list of (one > > list to handle ipv4 and another list for ipv6 because no API can work > > in both modes ...). > > > > I've never worked with DNS geolocation myself, so I cannot really judge > how such an API should look like. > > I would prefer if the geolocation function in Bundy would be implemented > as an optional module (plugin). One of the main design features on Bundy > is modularization. > > There is currently no documentation on how to write a Bundy module, but > if you are willing to work on the geolocation part, we could work > together and I will write the documentation on the geolocation as well > as a documentation on how to write a Bundy extension module. > > Best regards > > Carsten Strotmann > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.bundy-dns.de/pipermail/bundy-hackers/attachments/20140912/4db67752/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Bundy-hackers] Fwd: Bundy idea
- Next message: [Bundy-hackers] Fwd: Bundy idea
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]